Parent Company Liability Under the Clean Air Act: Federal District Court Applies Bestfoods and Imposes $100 Million Penalty and $20 Million in Mitigation
In a February 17, 2026 decision with significant implications for corporate parents, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held in United States v. EES Coke Battery, LLC that parent company DTE Energy Company and two affiliates were liable as “operators” under the Clean Air Act (CAA) for New Source Review (NSR) violations at a subsidiary’s coke battery facility. In a case of first impression, the court applied the standard for direct parent company liability established in United States v. Bestfoods to a source under the CAA. Moreover, the ruling includes a $100 million civil penalty, one of the largest CAA penalties issued by a court to a stationary source. The court ordered an additional $20 million in community mitigation, and also ordered EES Coke to obtain an NSR permit that may require the source to install costly new pollution controls.
EPA, Departments of Interior and Energy Announce New Coal-Friendly Policy Initiatives
On September 29, 2025, the Trump Administration unveiled a sweeping set of policy initiatives aimed at revitalizing the U.S. coal sector that spans multiple federal agencies and includes measures such as increased funding and financial incentives, relief from environmental regulatory requirements, and increased access to public lands. In the unveiling, the Administration emphasized the importance of American “energy dominance” and the increased demand for electricity to power artificial intelligence (AI) in order to ensure that the United States wins “the AI arms race” — two themes commonly highlighted by the Administration and its top officials.
EPA Proposes Overhaul of Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
On September 16, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a proposed rule that would fundamentally reshape the federal Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). 90 Fed. Reg. 44591 (Sept. 16, 2025). If finalized, this action would mark a further shift in federal greenhouse gas (GHG) policy and advance the administration’s broader deregulatory agenda.
D.C. Circuit Restores Emergency Affirmative Defense for Title V Permit Holders
The D.C. Circuit recently reversed EPA’s rescission of a 1990s rule that established an emergency affirmative defense under the Clean Air Act for Title V permit holders that exceed an emission limitation due to an emergency. Our team breaks down what this means for facilities facing unexpected emissions exceedances.
D.C. Circuit Upholds U.S. EPA’s HFC Cap-and-Trade Program Under AIM Act
On August 1, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority under the American Innovation and Manufacturing (AIM) Act to phase down hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) through a cap-and-trade program. In IGas Holdings, Inc. v. EPA, No. 23-1261, a unanimous panel rejected constitutional and administrative law challenges from refrigerant industry members, finding that the AIM Act provides a clear “intelligible principle” to guide EPA’s allowance allocation. The Court also held that EPA’s decision to exclude 2020 market data from its allocation methodology was not arbitrary and capricious.
PG&E Agrees to First-Ever Accidental Release Reporting Settlement
On July 28, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a settlement with Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) for failing to promptly report an accidental release. This is the first-ever settlement for the failure to comply with the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) Accidental Release Reporting Rule (Reporting Rule).
EPA Updates Clean Air Act Standards Applicable to Small Waste Incinerators
On June 30, 2025, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized updates to its New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines for Other Solid Waste Incineration (OSWI) units under the Clean Air Act (CAA). These units — combustion systems that incinerate solid waste from commercial or institutional sources not otherwise regulated under specific incinerator categories — include very small municipal waste combustors and institutional incinerators. The final rule includes applicability-related and definitional changes expanding the class of incinerators subject to NSPS, revises the OSWI subcategories and tightens emission limits for key pollutants. It also adopts changes to startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM), and expands testing, monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements that will affect both existing and new OSWI units.
Supreme Court Issues Split Rulings on Clean Air Act Venue Disputes
On June 18, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued decisions in two significant Clean Air Act cases — EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining and Oklahoma v. EPA — clarifying the appropriate venue for legal challenges to certain final EPA actions. In Calumet, the Court held that EPA’s universal denials of small-refinery-exemption (SRE) petitions under the Renewable Fuel Standard program were “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect,” and thus challenges may only be brought in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. By contrast, the Court in Oklahoma held that challenges to EPA’s disapproval of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) belong in the applicable regional circuit courts because the agency’s determinations were based on facts and rationales unique to each state. Although some gray areas remain, the twin decisions put several long-standing venue issues to rest and should encourage quicker resolution of Clean Air Act regulatory challenges.
Presidential Exemption for Certain Stationary Sources of Air Pollution
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has opened an electronic mailbox to allow regulated sources to request a Presidential Exemption under section 112(i)(4) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) from nine National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) that EPA is reconsidering (see table below) across the energy, manufacturing, and chemical sectors.
The Future of Environmental Review of Federal Permitting Remains Unsteady as White House Seeks to Rescind NEPA Regulations
On February 19, 2025, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) submitted a proposed Interim Final Rule rescinding its regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The Rule will become effective 45 days after its publication in the Federal Register, marking the end of nearly 50 years of CEQ regulations serving as the foundation for federal environmental reviews. This Interim Rule comes right at the deadline set by President Trump’s Executive Order (EO) 14154—Unleashing American Energy—which rescinded CEQ’s authority to issue NEPA regulations and revoked President Carter’s EO 11991, which had originally directed CEQ to promulgate implementing regulations.
